Arnold I. Kramer v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
This is the third opinion of this circuit in three months dealing with Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D), which provides that when a defendant alleges inaccuracies in his or her presentence report the sentencing judge is required to make written findings as to the allegations, or a written determination that the disputed matters will not be relied upon for sentencing, and must attach those findings or that determination to the presen-tence report. See, United States v. Hamm, 786 F.2d 804 (7th Cir.1986); United States v. Eschweiler, 782 F.2d 1385 (7th Cir.1986). As was done in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Dennis D. RoneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Andrew EschweilerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Roy H. HammCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Brett C. KimberlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Alvin SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Richard Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Andrew Theodorou v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Ken GattasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Arnold I. Kramer v. O.C. Jenkins, Warden, and United States Parole Commission, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.