Legal Opinion

Arnold I. Kramer v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 15, 1986No. 85-2803PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

This is the third opinion of this circuit in three months dealing with Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D), which provides that when a defendant alleges inaccuracies in his or her presentence report the sentencing judge is required to make written findings as to the allegations, or a written determination that the disputed matters will not be relied upon for sentencing, and must attach those findings or that determination to the presen-tence report. See, United States v. Hamm, 786 F.2d 804 (7th Cir.1986); United States v. Eschweiler, 782 F.2d 1385 (7th Cir.1986). As was done in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. Dennis D. RoneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Andrew EschweilerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Roy H. HammCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Brett C. KimberlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Alvin SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Richard Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Andrew Theodorou v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Ken GattasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. Arnold I. Kramer v. O.C. Jenkins, Warden, and United States Parole Commission, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API