Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Strobel v. Rusch

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided December 11, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00656Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO VOLKER STROBEL, HEIKE STROBEL, and HANS BAUR, in their individual capacities and on behalf of UNC Holdings LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, v. No. CIV 1:18-00656-RB-JFR UWE RUSCH and DR. MABEL RUSCH, Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER A lawyer’s duties of loyalty to, and zealous representation of, their clients are challenged when the client fails to pay for legal services. When a lawyer moves to withdraw from representation for non-payment of fees, the motion is typically granted. But…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whiting v. LacaraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Washington v. Sherwin Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Brandon v. BlechCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Kevin C. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Rusinow v. KamaraDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API