Legal Opinion

Blaine Bank of Montana v. Haugen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1993No. 92-430PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

Russell and Donn Haugen appeal from an order of the Seventeenth Judicial District Court, Blaine County, denying their motion to preclude entry of deficiency judgment. We affirm.

We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

1. Did the District Court err by allowing the Haugens to file an action to recover damages, if any, resulting from a judicial foreclosure sale which violated § 25-13-704(2), MCA, instead of precluding deficiency judgment?

2. Did the District Court err by declining to preclude deficiency judgment based on its determination that the Haugens did not own personal property located…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trustees of Washington — Idaho — Montana Carpenters — Employers Retirement Trust Fund v. Galleria PartnershipMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Wippert v. Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian ReservationMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Farmers State Bank v. Mobile Homes UnlimitedMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Westmont Tractor Co. v. Continental I, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Bank of Sheridan v. DeversMontana Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kauffman-Harmon v. KauffmanMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Volk v. GoeserMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of SaylorMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Springer Group, Inc. v. WittelsohnNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Wyo-Ben, Inc. v. BixbyMontana Supreme Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API