Legal Opinion

Hulse v. Pacific & Idaho Northern Railway Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1929No. 5105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Arthur Pierce Hulse was killed in the course of his employment with appellant as a section foreman. His widow sought as a dependent compensation under the Idaho Workmen’s Compensation Act (C. S. 1919, sees. 6213-6339, as amended).

Appellant railway is a common carrier engaged in interstate and intrastate commerce. Deceased was employed in maintenance of way work. Each section of the right of way was provided with a gasoline motor-car, and, in addition, the railroad provided an extra one to be used in the event that any of the others were out of commission. When not in such use the company…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moser v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Reinke v. ThomsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Moser v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API