Legal Opinion

Paull v. MEYERS

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1962No. Appeals, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 166, 167, 168, and 169PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

These appeals are from orders of the Court , of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, refusing the motions of Catherine Geris, executrix of the Estate of Gus Geris, the appellant, for judgment non obstante veredicto and for a new trial.

Verdicts having been rendered in favor of appellees, George J. Pauli, individually, and as administrator of the Estate of Clara Pauli, deceased, Richard J. Meyers and Antoinetta Pisano, the testimony must be read in a light most favorable to them and all conflicts resolved in their favor.

The facts appear to be as follows: On November 19, 1957,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lambert v. PolenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Tancredi v. M. Buten & SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Brown v. Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Dougherty v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Brandeis v. Charter Mutual Benefit Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cody v. S.K.F. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Hreha v. BenscoterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Jennison v. AACHERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Moyer v. State Real Estate CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Gerisch v. McElhoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API