Legal Opinion

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Cam

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 2, 2017No. AC38622PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLavine, J.

The defendant Eugene A. Cam 1 appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure claiming that the trial court erred when it concluded that a settlement agreement he had entered into with the plaintiff, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., permitted the plaintiff to pay the defendant a certain sum of money within a "reasonable time" of the payment deadline provided in the agreement. 2 We affirm the judgment of the court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the defendant's claim. On February 11, 2004, the defendant executed and delivered a note in the amount of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'CONNOR v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Mihalyak v. MihalyakConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  3. Allstate Life Insurance v. BFA Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Grenier v. Compratt Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Lind-Larsen v. Fleet National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United Cleaning & Restoration, LLC v. KoskeridesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API