Legal Opinion · Dissent

Whataburger, Inc. v. Rockwell

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 30, 1997No. 2950891Published

1Dissent

I believe that the trial court should have granted a directed verdict in favor of Whataburger. In order to properly support his negligence claim against Whataburger, Rockwell must have established that the defendant owed him a duty of care, that the defendant breached that duty, that Rockwell suffered loss or injury, and that the defendant's negligence was the actual and proximate cause of that loss or injury. John R. Cowley Bros., Inc. v. Brown, 569 So.2d 375 (Ala. 1990).

The dispositive issue in deciding whether a directed verdict should have been granted by the trial court is whether…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moye v. A.G. Gaston Motels, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. John R. Cowley & Bros., Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Henley v. Pizitz Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Young v. Huntsville Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Nail v. Jefferson County Truck Growers Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API