Legal Opinion

Harry Pitts, William Faust, Philip D'angelo, Arthur Sharp and Jack Travis v. Elvin H. Kunsman

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 27, 1966No. 15904_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO TAX

Before GANEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

GANEY, Circuit Judge.

In an action brought by the five members of the School Board of the Borough of Girardville, Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania, for injunctive relief against a number of individual defendants, nine of whom are members of the presently constituted Interim Operating Committee of Administrative Unit 63-9 of Schuylkill County (“Committee”), the district court, by order dated March 16, 1966, enjoined that Committee from taking any action with regard to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jamison Coal & Coke Co. v. Unity Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Phipps v. School Dist. of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  3. Horigan v. City of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kimmey v. H. A. Berkheimer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Mandel v. HutchinsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
  3. Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Caputo v. Globe Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API