Legal Opinion

In Re the Probate of the Alleged Will of Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 29, 1987PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

Underlying this appeal is the factual question whether the decedent intended a holographic writing to be her last will and testament. The Law Division ruled that she did not so intend and that the writing should not be admitted to probate. Although the Appellate Division sustained the finding that the decedent did not intend the writing to be her will, that court ordered the admission of the writing to probate because “to do so would implement the decedent’s probable intent in the absence of execution of a formal will.” Will of Smith, 209…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Engle v. SiegelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. Brandt v. SchuchaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Cedars of Lebanon Hospital v. PagelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Osterkamp v. WeeksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of PetersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Truex v. Ocean Dodge, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  3. In Re Probate of Will and Codicil of MacOolNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  4. In the Matter of the Application for a Retail FirearmsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
  5. MBCC v. LotitoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API