Lawrence v. Southern Pac. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York
On Motion to Remand to State Court.
1Opinion of the Court
CHATFIELD, District Judge.
A long statement of facts on the present application seems unnecessary. Certain litigation has been had in the slate courts, resulting in the dismissal of the complaint. MacArdell v. Olcott, 189 N. Y. 368, 82 N. E. 181. A second action, upon allegations growing out of the same state of fads, but setting forth a different cause of action, has been brought in the Supreme Court of the county of Queens, in the stale of New York, by Walter B. Lawrence, on behalf of himself and other stockholders of the Houston & Texas Central Railway Company, against Southern Pacific…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Kinney v. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Western Loan & Savings Co. v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Geer v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Massachusetts & Southern Construction Co. v. Cane Creek TownshipSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- O'Neil v. Wolcott Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Peterson v. SucroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Harding v. Standard Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1910
- Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co. v. Adams CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Lawrence v. Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.