Legal Opinion

Tate v. Tate

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 1990No. 71355Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BAILEY, Judge:

Appellant Russell Paul Tate (Appellant or Husband) seeks review of the Trial Court’s order allowing attorney fees to Ap-pellee Sheila Ann Tate, now McDonald (Ap-pellee or Wife) on Wife’s application therefor. The parties divorced in 1986, and Husband directed to pay child support. Husband fell in arrears and Wife cited Husband for contempt. On April 28, 1987, the date of hearing on the contempt citation, Husband confessed arrearage. The parties also stipulated to Wife’s entitlement to attorney’s fees, the amount of which to be determined by agreement, or in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Oliver's Sports Center, Inc. v. National Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Dowdell v. DowdellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Durland v. DurlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Lavender v. LavenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API