Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. McKinley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1931No. 20500. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Dunn

William McKinley, the plaintiff in error, was found guilty in the municipal court of Chicago of a violation of section 3855 of the Chicago municipal code of 1922 by permitting an automobile to stand for a period of time longer than was necessary for the reasonably expeditious loading or unloading of passengers and for a greater length of time than three minutes, in front of 167 West 'Quincy street, within the area of restricted parking established by the ordinance. It was shown that he drove his car, a passenger sedan, in Quincy street and stopped at No. 175, between Wells and LaSalle…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cohen v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. People ex rel. Abt v. BowmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  3. People ex rel. Henderson v. OnahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. John A. Tolman & Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Wilder v. Aurora, DeKalb & Rockford Electric Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Brackett v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  4. City of Bloomington v. WirrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  5. City of Chicazgo v. RhineIllinois Supreme Court · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API