Legal Opinion
Ramadan v. Chase Manhattan Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 6, 2000No. 99-5709UnknownCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal requires us to apply the Truth in Lending Act’s assignee liability provisions in light of contract language required by regulatory fiat and to determine the parameters of assignee liability under the TILA. Asserting a violation of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., plaintiff alleges she was harmed by deceptive lending practices of a dealer from whom she purchased an automobile. Plaintiff seeks to recover against Hyundai Motor Finance Co., the assignee of her finance agreement, rather than against the automobile dealer.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Susanne H. Ramadan, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Chase Manhattan Corporation Hyundai Motor Finance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Port Authority of New York and New Jersey v. Arcadian Corp Dyno Nobel Inc, F/k/a, Ireco Incorporated Hydro Agri North America, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Alexander v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Taylor v. Quality Hyundai, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Smith v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Susanne H. Ramadan, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Chase Manhattan Corporation Hyundai Motor Finance Co. Susanne H. RamadanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Bobby G. Vickers and Casey R. Vickers v. Interstate DodgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004