Hammer v. Smith
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, in and for the County of Yavapai. Richard E. Sloan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtNave, J.
— A. H. Hammer applied to the district court for a writ of certiorari to review the action of the, board of supervisors of Yavapai county in letting a contract for public printing for the year 1907, alleging that the contract had been let without giving the notice required by statute. The board of supervisors appeared in the action and demurred to the sufficiency of the application. The district court sustained the demurrer, and dismissed the proceeding. Prom the judgment of dismissal, the petitioner has appealed.
One question alone need be considered in determining this appeal. Our statutes…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Quinchard v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People Ex Rel. Kasschau v. Board of Police CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Gilbert v. Board of Police & Fire CommissionersUtah Supreme Court · 1895
- People ex rel. Cochran v. Bd. of Educ. of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People ex rel. Fries v. Supervisors of Marin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1858
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Danielley v. City of PrincetonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
- Newell v. Franklin, CommissionersSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1910
- State ex rel. City of Huntington v. LombardoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. LombardoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965