Legal Opinion

Barksdale v. National Bank of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1990No. Docket 114702, 114925, 117771, 118058PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, P.J.

In these consolidated actions, plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s granting of sum mary disposition in favor of defendant, National Bank of Detroit. We affirm.

Plaintiff Anthony Barksdale was injured in an automobile accident on March 29, 1986, while riding as a passenger in a vehicle being driven by defendant Humphries. Humphries had leased the vehicle from a Cadillac dealership, which in turn had assigned the lease to defendant nbd. That lease extended for four years and included an option to purchase. Plaintiff Anthony Kenney is Barksdale’s son, who filed a separate action for loss of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scameheorn v. BucksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Moore v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hill v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Faz v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. Hill v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Hill v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Woods v. Alken Auto Sales Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API