Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hill v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1994No. Docket 156325Published

1DissentCorrigan, J.

I dissent from the majority’s holding that defendant General Motors Acceptance Corporation may be found liable pursuant to the owner’s liability statute, MCL 257.401; MSA 9.2101, as an owner of the 1986 Buick Somerset leased to Rodderick Toliver. I would affirm the circuit court’s ruling that gmac is not legally responsible under the amended provisions of the Vehicle Code. See Barksdale v Nat'l Bank of Detroit, 186 Mich App 286; 463 NW2d 258 (1990). I cannot agree that a genuine issue of material fact exists on this record.

I acknowledge that 1988 PA 125, effective May 23, 1988, controls the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kamalnath v. Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State Bank of Standish v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Whitcraft v. WolfeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Boyd v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Culver v. CastroMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API