Hill v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentCorrigan, J.
I dissent from the majority’s holding that defendant General Motors Acceptance Corporation may be found liable pursuant to the owner’s liability statute, MCL 257.401; MSA 9.2101, as an owner of the 1986 Buick Somerset leased to Rodderick Toliver. I would affirm the circuit court’s ruling that gmac is not legally responsible under the amended provisions of the Vehicle Code. See Barksdale v Nat'l Bank of Detroit, 186 Mich App 286; 463 NW2d 258 (1990). I cannot agree that a genuine issue of material fact exists on this record.
I acknowledge that 1988 PA 125, effective May 23, 1988, controls the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kamalnath v. Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- State Bank of Standish v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Whitcraft v. WolfeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Boyd v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Culver v. CastroMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.