Fauley v. Heska Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HON. JORGE L. ALONSO, United States District Judge
Plaintiff alleges that defendants violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) by sending him a fax advertisement, which did not contain an opt-out notice, without his permission or invitation. The case is before the Court on defendant Heska’s motion to stay. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion.
Background
“In 2006, Congress enacted the Junk Fax Prevention Act, which amended the fax advertising provisions of the TCPA.” In re Rules & Regulations Implementing the Tel. Consumer Prot.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Mountain States Power Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Deborah Ryan, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of Her Son, Kevin v. Chemlawn Corporation, and Chemlawn Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Physicians Healthsource, Inc. v. Stryker Sales Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2014
3Cited by3 opinions
- Advanced Dermatology v. Fieldwork, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Dixie Plumbing Specialties, Inc. v. Fieldwork Chicago-Schaumburg, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Teamsters Local Union No. 727 Pension Fund v. Capital Parking, L.L.CDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021