Legal Opinion
Ft. Smith & Western R. R. v. Syracuse Portrait Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 23, 1926No. 15520PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, O.
There are numerous assignments of e,rror, but in the presentation of the case in the brief of defendants < nly two propositions are argued as follows:
“ (1) That the undisputed testimony shows that the goods were destroyed by fire while in defendants’ custody as warehousemen, and that the evidence fails to show any negligence or want of care upon the part of defendants.
“ (2) That the trial court erred in giving certain instructions and in refusing cer-tan other requested instructions.”
In this case plaintiff brought its action upon its contract for carriage and safe…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Wilson v. California Central RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Standard Marine Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Traders CompressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Walker v. EikleberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- St. Louis, I. M. & S Ry. Co. v. BentleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Traders Compress Co. v. PrecureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Price, Adm'xSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Deming v. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Syracuse Portrait Co. v. Ft. Smith & Western Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931