Legal Opinion

Colm v. Francis

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1916No. Civ. No. 1519PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. J. W. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is a suit for the specific performance of a certain contract for a lease, or, more accurately speaking, to compel the defendant, Mary F. Francis, to execute a lease of certain land to the plaintiff in accordance with the terms of a certain written agreement, to be hereafter more specifically referred to.

The said defendant (respondent herein) demurred to the complaint on general and special grounds. The demurrer was sustained and, the plaintiff refusing or failing to amend, judgment was thereupon entered against him and in favor of the respondent.

This appeal is- brought here by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stark v. StarrsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Witherspoon v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Carroll v. SaffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Wirth v. BransonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Barney v. DolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Loranger v. NadeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Wohlgemuth v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Yamaha Motor Corp. v. PasemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Garton v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Mohlmann v. City of BurbankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API