Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Burkhart

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1983No. 2410PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOUNG, Justice.

The primary issue in this suit is whether Arthur L. Gibson and Thomas A. Gibson and their predecessors have perfected a limitation title to three tracts of land located in Matagorda County. William G. Burk-hart and Edward Y. Browning instituted this action claiming that they were entitled to an undivided one-half interest in the land. The Gibsons pleaded that they have title by limitation. After a trial without a jury, the trial court held adversely to the Gibsons and ordered a partition of the land. We affirm.

The common source of title to the property in question was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burnett v. MotykaTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Omohundro v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Schaefer v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Orsborn v. Deep Rock Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Bruni v. VidaurriTexas Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Glover v. Union Pacific Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  2. Maeberry v. Gayle, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  3. Light v. Whittington (In re Whittington)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2014
  4. A. Wolfson's Sons, Inc. v. First State Bank of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Malcolm Dillon, Virginia Cutter, R.K. Dillon and J.W. Achen v. Delmon Hodges and Connell AshleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API