Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Bussman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 30, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by Peter W. Van Peyma and others from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Erie, entered in the office of said Surrogate’s Court on the 27th day of June, 1918, with notice of intention to bring up 'for review two other decrees.

1Opinion of the Court

Kruse, P. J.:

This is a proceeding by an administratrix de bonis non to compel an accounting of the administration of the original administrator, now deceased. The matter comes here for the second time. The decree was reversed on the first appeal and the matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court. (182 App. Div. 335.) It was thought that additional evidence might be available respecting the matters in controversy, but none of importance has been added to what is contained in the record on the first appeal. This appeal was heard upon the records on both appeals and we have re-examined the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ford v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of MullonNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of BussmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Schwartz v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. In re the Estate of BoyleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API