Miller v. Gidiere & Marmande
Supreme Court of Louisiana
A PPEAL from the Nineteenth District Court, Parish of Terrebonne. IT Goode, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
MANNING, J.
The plaintiff claims eleven hundred dollars as overseer’s wages. The defendants admit that he had earned $356 66, hut aver they have paid that sum, and deny owing any more.
The plaintiff was examined as a witness on the trial, and admitted the payment alleged and declared it was a proper credit upon his demand. The judgment was for 'the difference, $743 34, and the defendant appealed.
The plaintiff moves to dismiss.
There is a distinction between this case and Denégre vs. Moran, 35 A. 346, which at first glance seems too finely drawn, hut it…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Butte Hardware Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fahey v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Crusel v. Houssiere-Latreille Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Fletcher v. CrichtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Sharp v. McBrideSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Fletcher v. CrichtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935