Legal Opinion

Barnett v. First National Bank of Omaha

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 3, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00337Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION DAVID BARNETT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-337-CHB ) v. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, ) ORDER ) Defendant. ) ) ) *** *** *** *** This matter is before the Court on Defendant First National Bank of Omaha’s (“FNBO”) Motion for Summary Judgment, [R. 31]. Plaintiff David Barnett filed a Response, [R. 32]. FNBO filed a Reply, [R. 35]. This matter is now ripe for review. For the reasons stated below, FNBO’s Motion for Summary Judgment will be denied in part and granted in part. I.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Facebook, Inc. v. DuguidSupreme Court of the United States · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API