Legal Opinion

Cahill v. McCown

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1926No. 19736. En BancPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover the sum of two thousand three hundred and fifty dollars, alleged to be the balance of the proceeds of a crop of wheat, grown upon certain premises sold under conditional sale contract by plaintiffs to the defendants in May, 1920. The contract was in the sum of thirty-four thousand dollars, and provided for the payment of two thousand dollars down, the assuming of an eight thousand dollar mortgage and the balance, twenty-four thousand dollars, to be paid on or before six years thereafter. There was a provision in the contract requiring the defendants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blenz v. FogleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Sainsbury v. Wapato Fruit & Cold Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones-Short Motor Co. v. BolinWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Chavelle v. DuclosWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Rathke v. Dexter Horton National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Blake v. BahrWashington Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API