Legal Opinion
Delta Novelty Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided April 28, 1969No. P69/121; protests 67/15902, etc. (New York); No. P69/122; protests 67/20260, etc. (New York); No. P 69/123; protests 67/30476, etc. (New York); No. P69/124; protests 67/34393, etc. (Boston); No. P69/125; protests 67/36345, etc. (New York); Po. P69/126; protests 67/55000, etc. (Los Angeles); No. P69/127; protests 67/83206 and 67/6396 (Philadelphia); No. P69/128; protests 67/86015-6153, etc. (Chicago); No. P69/129; protests 68/33639-7892, etc. (Chicago)Published
1Opinion of the CourtWatsoN, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made of the foregoing, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the merchandise the subject of Armbee (Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and Zunold Trading Corporation et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Armbee Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Zunold Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968