Legal Opinion

United States v. Eugene James Allegrucci

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 22, 1962No. 13684_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 659 for possession of goods stolen from interstate commerce, knowing them to be stolen. The goods in question were a Bell & Howell motion picture projector and two Rolleicord cameras. 1 The case has been here before and was sent back for a new trial because of what the Court found to be erroneous instructions to the jury. United States v. Allegrucci, 3 Cir., 258 F.2d 70 (1958).

The appellant first argues that the evidence in the case is insufficient to sustain the conviction. The statute is a technical…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Rosenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. Salvatore AnnunziatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. Michael Anthony AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. Charles Edward Matthews, Ezekiel Brown and Raymond Cook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Donald Lee Hale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. James Hamilton Appeal of Donald KiblerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API