Legal Opinion

United States v. Handy

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 9, 1955No. 257PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, District Judge.

This case is here on remand, 1 a majority of the Court of Appeals having ruled that opportunity must be afforded relator to prove the allegations in his petition for habeas corpus, insofar as they relate to the alleged atmosphere of hysteria and prejudice prevailing at his trial, including any issues raised by Judge Boyer’s asserted visits to the court room. 2 After a hearing was scheduled 3 respondent moved 4 to dismiss contending that the court lacked jurisdiction and judicial power to conduct the inquiry or to grant the writ. The motion is without merit. Similar…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Darcy v. HandySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Loyd Carl Ray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  4. Albina Engine & Machine Works, Inc. v. AbelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  5. United States ex rel. Darcy v. HandyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API