Legal Opinion

Graham v. Day

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1967No. 28238, 28239, 28240, 28241, 28242, 28243, 28244 and 28245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, C. J.

An appeal on questions of law is made herein by the Board of County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County from a judgment of the Probate Court in which the special assessments levied on plaintiff-appellees’ properties were found to be confiscatory and hence void and were modified, and, as to one parcel, eliminated.

These actions were originally appealed to the Probate Court by the property owners under favor of Sections 6117.09 and 6117.10, Revised Code, from a decision of the Board of County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County in determining to proceed with the County Sewer District Improvement No.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richey v. MoorTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Domito v. Village of MaumeeOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. City of Edinburg v. MageeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Simmons v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re WhitneyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
  3. Simmons v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API