Legal Opinion

State v. Lissy

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1987No. CC 10-84-08136; CA A35041; SC S34184PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

Defendant appealed his conviction for aggravated murder to the Court of Appeals, assigning as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress certain recorded telephone conversations between defendant and others and the recorded out-of-court statements of a co-conspirator, David Wilson. The Court of Appeals affirmed defendant’s conviction. State v. Lissy, 85 Or App 484, 737 P2d 617 (1987). We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Defendant relies upon two points for reversal:

“[I.] Telephone calls are wire communication. The obtaining of wire communications must be through…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Billeci v. United States. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. State v. UnderwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. LissyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. KleinOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. NielsenOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. FleetwoodOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. DimeoOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. KnobelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API