Legal Opinion
Smith v. Crotts
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 23, 1958No. 38032PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
-WILLIAMS, Justice.
' ’-’Upon the return of a jury verdict, -⅛ ' judgment was entered in the trial court in 1 favor of plaintiff in error against the defendants Ike Crotts •■and Lester Dean ■Chronister, in the amount of $175,000. The named defendants in the trial -below "have not appealed that judgment. Nor has plaintiff in error presented a propó-hsition of error as to her judgment against • Chronister except to say. he confessed, in ■ the trial court, her motion for new 'trial (which, however, was overruled by the trial court). She specifically abandons her appeal as to defendant Crotts. ,
'•…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matsumato v. Arizona Sand and Rock CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Ellis & Lewis, Inc. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Oklahoma City Construction Co. v. Onno PeppardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Zatkin v. KatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Carter, Adm'r v. PinkertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith Brothers Road Construction Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- JOHN W. SIMMONS TRUCKING COMPANY v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962