People v. Osgood
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentMeyer, J.
This appeal illustrates the frailty of the English language and contrast in judicial philosophies. To bring the problem it presents more clearly into focus, it is important to note that we deal not with the constitutional due process right to a speedy trial, but with what the Legislature meant to require when it enacted CPL 30.30. The majority concludes that the section must be interpreted to require dismissal of a felony indictment and consequent bar to further prosecution of its charge or charges (CPL 210.20, subd 4), without trial, without any indication of prejudice to the defendant, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- People v. LomaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. SkinnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.