Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Hiscock

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Lenawee. (Lane, J.) Appeal from allowance of claim against the estate of a deceased person. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

A claim was allowed to Abraham Han-ford against the estate of deceased, which consisted of a series of charges, beginning in 1871. Orrin Hiscock died in March, 1886. Down to the close of 1876 all the debit items were for board of Hiscock and wife, except one for a nurse, and $152 for funeral expenses, and $225 money lent. Mrs. Hiscock died December 1,- 1875, and Orrin Hiscock is charged for no board since November, 1876. *537Previous to that time there are two credits for “cash on board," and no others. In 1878 and 1879 there are two unexplained credits of cash. There are no other items on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sperry v. Estate of MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Kimball v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Seyburn, Kahn, Ginn, Bess, Deitch & Serlin, PC v. BakshiMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Lester v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Fuerbringer v. HermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Rodgers v. Lamb's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API