Legal Opinion
Hrabinski v. Exxon Chemical Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 15, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
258 N.J. Super. 143 (1992)
609 A.2d 120
RICHARD HRABINSKI AND DEBORAH HRABINSKI, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
EXXON CHEMICAL COMPANY, A DIVISION OF EXXON CORPORATION, JERRY FRIX, FRAN SCHIACCHETANO, ED MILLER, JOHN HEDDEN, INDEPENDENT LABORATORY EMPLOYEES UNION, INC., DONNA HERRAN, DON GIVENS, WILLIAM BOWMAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Union County.
Decided May 15, 1992.
John J. Haggerty, III (Gold, Haggerty, and Adams), for plaintiffs.
Richard P. Weitzman (Weitzman & Weitzman), for defendants.
OPINION
ALLEY, J.S.C.
1. Introduction:
Plaintiff asserts claims arising from alleged…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Reed v. United Transportation UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farber v. City of PatersonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Allen v. Hennepin CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Allen v. Hennepin CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004