Allen v. Hennepin County
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1DissentMinge, Judge
I respectfully dissent. I recognize that statutes of limitation promote an important policy of bringing closure to disputes and protecting people from stale claims. Wschola v. Snyder, 478 N.W.2d 225, 227 (Minn.App.1991), review denied (Minn. Feb. 10, 1992). But because these statutes, especially those providing for short periods, can lead to harsh results, they have been narrowly construed. See Kittson County v. Wells, Denbrook & Assoc., 308 Minn. 237, 241, 241 N.W.2d 799, 801 (1976) (construing statute of limitations narrowly, in part, because failing to do so could have a harsh result);…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kittson County v. Wells, Denbrook & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Kaiser v. Memorial Blood Center of Minneapolis, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Casner v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal EmployeesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Norton v. Adair CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.