Dunsmore v. Blount-Decker Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
(after stating the facts as above).
The appellee’s right to the timber depends upon the terms and legal effect of the deed set up in the petition. If the instrument should properly be construed as intending to convey the timber in fee simple as an interest in the land on which it stood, then, under the authority of Lodwick Lumber Co. v. Taylor, 100 Tex. 270, 98 S. W. 238, 123 Am. St. Rep. 803, the appellee would be entitled to have the restraining order granted by the judge; but if the instrument should properly be construed as expressing the intention of the parties to convey the timber as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lodwick Lumber Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Carter v. Clark & Boice Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Lancaster v. RothCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Whitaker v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Miles v. BodenheimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nagy v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- City of Baytown v. General Tel. Co. of the SouthwestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Griner v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Davis v. Haslam Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Sutton v. Wright SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.