Legal Opinion

Huerta v. School Dist. No. 431

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1989No. 17089Published

1Opinion of the Court

773 P.2d 1130 (1989)

116 Idaho 43

Juan HUERTA, Claimant-Appellant,

v.

SCHOOL DISTRICT # 431, Employer, State Insurance Fund, Surety, and

State of Idaho, Industrial Special Indemnity Fund, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 17089.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

April 28, 1989.

Uranga & Uranga, Boise, for claimant-appellant. Louis L. Uranga argued.

Hyde, Wetherell, Bray & Haff, Boise, for respondent, School District # 431 and State Ins. Fund. Michael E. Wetherell argued.

Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Boise, and Skinner, Fawcett & Mauk of Boise, for respondents, State of Idaho, Industrial Special Indemnity Fund. William L.…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lyons v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Sheets v. Agro-West, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Paulson v. Idaho Forest Industries, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Kelley v. ProutyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API