Legal Opinion

Greenfield Tap & Die Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 6, 1929No. F-157PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge

This suit arises out of two contracts, the first a cost-plus contract dated April 20, 1917, for the supplying of two sets of gauges. It was to be completed in six months and the contract provided that—

“ It is mutually agreed that the payments due the contractor under this contract shall in no event exceed a total of one hundred thousand (100,000) dollars, and in case the entire work contemplated by this contract shall not have been satisfactorily completed when the total payments due have reached the sum of one hundred thousand (100,000) dollars, the contractor shall complete the remaining…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jefferson Hotel Co. v. BrumbaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
  2. Caldwell & Drake v. SchmulbachDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1909
  3. Stewart-McGehee Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commerce International Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  2. Commerce International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. C & L Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  4. Vogt Bros. Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Scherr and McDermott Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API