Legal Opinion

Meyers v. Markham

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 1903No. Nos. 13,506—(173)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Pine county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Crosby, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action tó cancel certain contracts for the sale of six hundred eighty acres of land in Pine county, and to remove the record thereof, as *231clouds upon plaintiff’s title. Defendant had a judgment in the court below, and plaintiff appealed therefrom.

The short facts are as follows: In July, 1895, one Ogren was the owner of the land in controversy, or of some interest therein, and entered into an agreement with the firm of Kelsey & Markham, whgreby, for the consideration of $300, he agreed to deliver to that firm deeds from all persons having claims against the property, with certain exceptions,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McNamara v. PengillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Colby v. StreetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Noyes v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. M. L. Gordon Sash & Door Co. v. MormannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. PageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. McVeety v. Harvey Mercantile Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API