Legal Opinion · Dissent

7-Eleven, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided December 30, 2003No. 2380012Published

1Dissent

HUMPHREYS, J.,

with whom BUMGARDNER, J., joins, dissenting.

Because I would find that the circuit court properly applied the substantial evidence standard and the arbitrary and capricious standard in upholding the Department’s reimbursement of “costs” to 7-Eleven under the statutes governing the Fund, and because I would find that the Guidelines governing the Fund comply fully with the charge given to the Department by the legislature, I do not join in the analysis or holding of the majority opinion.

*86I. Standard of Review

As stated in the majority opinion, issues of “pure statutory interpretation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Herb's Welding, Inc. v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Johnston-Willis, Ltd. v. KenleyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  4. Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  5. Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission v. York Street Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API