Legal Opinion
Hill v. Chemical Bank
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 4, 1992No. 3-92 CIV 255, 3-92 CIV 387PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALSOP, District Judge.
The above-entitled matters came on for hearing before this court on July 21, 1992, upon the motions of plaintiffs to remand these matters to state court. Although these matters are not formally consolidated, the remand motions have been heard and considered together because the issues in both motions are identical. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ motions to remand will be denied.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND.
Plaintiffs in these matters are Minnesota residents who hold credit cards issued by defendant Chemical Bank, f/k/a Chemical Bank Delaware. Chemical Bank is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hawaii Ex Rel. Louie v. HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. James J. KassoufCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Copeland v. MBNA America, N.A.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Copeland v. MBNA America Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Tikkanen v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.