Whitworth v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Presiding Judge.
Following a jury trial, Bobby K. Whitworth appeals his conviction for influencing legislative action for pay while a State official.1 Whitworth does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, nor outline any specific harm which he suffered as a result of the actions of which he complains in this prosecution. Rather, he complains primarily of the actions of the Attorney General’s office in briefing J. Tom Morgan, the second special prosecutor appointed following the voluntary recusal in this case of the Attorney General and his staff, and the failure of the trial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gibbons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amusement Sales, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- VENTURA v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Amusement Sales, Inc. v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Peter Ulbrich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
- State v. Harold HousleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.