Legal Opinion

Rule v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 18, 1932PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

This is an action in tort, in which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him in an automobile accident caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant in so operating his car that it collided with the Ford truck driven by the plaintiff, from the rear, forcing the truck over an embankment. The verdict was for the plaintiff, and the case is before us on the defendant’s exceptions.

In his argument to the jury, counsel for the plaintiff, after referring to the testimony that, after the accident, the de: fendant did not go to the plaintiff’s ear, or offer any…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. Platt v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  3. Hatch v. DanielsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  4. Smith v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  5. French v. WheldonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ball v. Melsur Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. Johnson v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  3. Johnson v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1936
  4. Shea v. PiletteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  5. Estate of Kelley v. Moguls, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API