In re Keillor
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Markey, J. (dissenting).
I must dissent in respect to both the majority and concurring opinions. I do not accept the majority's statutory interpretation legerdemain by which "stomach" is added to the statutory definition of "intimate parts" under the aliases of "groin" and "inner thigh" and/or to make it synonymous with any of those words. "In determining the Legislature's intent, we must first look to the language of the statute itself." In re MKK , 286 Mich. App. 546, 556, 781 N.W.2d 132 (2009). Further, the Legislature is presumed to "be aware of the consequences of its use or omission of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re Olive/Metts MinorsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- In Re Trejo MinorsMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re JKMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. BreidenbachMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.