Legal Opinion

People v. Breidenbach

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2011No. Docket 140153PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, C.J.

In People v Helzer,1 this Court held that when a criminal defendant is charged with being a sexually delinquent person in relation to an underlying sexual offense, separate juries must determine a defendant’s guilt of the sexual delinquency charge and the underlying charge. In this case, defendant was convicted by a single jury of “indecent exposure as a sexually delinquent person.” The trial court granted defendant’s motion for a new trial after the Court of Appeals vacated his conviction on the ground that the first trial violated his procedural rights under Helzer. The prosecutor appealed,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. VanderVlietMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. GravesMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. People v. GainesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. People v. KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Auto-Owners Insurance v. SeilsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. People of Michigan v. Lonnie James ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Moody v. Home Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API