Legal Opinion

Hatfield v. Hatfield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 13, 1916No. 7328PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Garfield County ; James AV. Steen, Judge. Motion by L. G. Hatfield to modify a decree adjudging alimony to Maggie J. Hatfield. Motion granted, and Maggie J. Hatfield brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This appeal is from the order of the trial judge modifying a decree allowing alimony to the divorced wife, made upon notice and motion presented after the adjournment of the term at which the decree was made. It appears from the*1 record that on the 17th day of May, 1913. in an action pending in the district court of Garfield county by Maggie Hatfield against L. G. I-Iatfield, a decree of divorce was granted the plaintiff on the ground that “the defendant had been guilty of cruel and inhuman treatment toward the plaintiff.” The decree also adjusted the property rights of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Cross v. GouldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Stanfield v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Griggs v. HansonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gilcrease v. GilcreaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Aronson v. AronsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Boevers v. Election Bd. of Canadian CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Morrison v. SwinkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. W. W. Bennett & Co. v. La FayetteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API