Legal Opinion

Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Gilliam

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 6, 1924No. 7 Div. 507PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The appellant railway, company, plaintiff in the court below, sued appellees to recover $237 as an undercharge on an interstate shipment of freight, together with $7.11 war tax thereon, and with interest from September 8, 1920. The cause was tried before the court without a jury upon an agreed statement of facts, the salient features of which will be here stated. The trial resulted in a judgment for the defendants, from which the plaintiff railway company has prosecuted this appeal.

The defendants had purchased through a brokerage firm a carload of shorts at a stipulated price of $69 per ton,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. . TitusNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Western & Atlantic R. v. UnderwoodDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1922
  5. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Southern Ferro Concrete Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Gulf RR Co. v. Sankey Brothers, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Moss Lumber Co. v. Michigan Cent. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. W. L. Shepherd Lumber Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. M. Hohenberg & Co. v. HendrixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. BrownAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API