Legal Opinion

M. Hohenberg & Co. v. Hendrix

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 1, 1924No. 1 Div. 319PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Appellant sued appellee on a promissory note. No defense was interposed as against this suit upon the note, hut the defendant interposed a plea of set-off. The causé was tried before the court without a jury, and upon the conclusion of the evidence the court rendered a judgment in favor of the defendant on the plea of set-off, from which the plaintiff has prosecuted this appeal.

The first assignment of error seeks to review, the judgment of the trial court on the evidence, and such a review may here be had without exception having bean reserved thereto. Headley v. McCall, 205 Ala. 108, 87 So.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. Shut & KeihnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Akin v. Chancy Bros. Hardware & Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Western Ry. of Alabama v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Ferguson v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. JaffeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API