Legal Opinion

(PC) McElroy v. Gomez

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 9, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00658Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LATWAHN MCELROY, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00658-NONE-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. ) RECOMMENDING THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 14 GOMEZ, et al., ) A COURT ORDER, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, ) AND FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE 15 Defendants. ) CLAIM FOR RELIEF ) 16 ) (ECF Nos. 8, 33) ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff Latwahn McElroy is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 I. 21 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 22 This case…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API