Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Hicks

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 1982No. Crim. 22118PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BARNETT, J. *

Appellant was charged, in an information filed June 2, 1980, by the District Attorney for the City and County of San Francisco, with a violation of Penal Code sections 664 and 211 (count one), attempted robbery; with a violation of Penal Code section 245, subdivision (a), assault with a deadly weapon (count two); and, as a convicted felon, possession of a firearm in violation of Penal Code section 12021 (count three). It was further alleged that during the commission of the offenses in counts one and two appellant used a firearm within the meaning of Penal Code section…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. SANGHERACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. People v. QuinteroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. People v. OrtizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. People v. CuellarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. People v. McCleodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API