Legal Opinion
Employers Ass'n Inc. v. United Steelworkers
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 18, 1994No. Nos. 92-3636, 92-3641PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
On behalf of itself and its members, plaintiff Employers Association challenged the validity of the Minnesota Striker Replacement Law, Minn.Stat. § 179.12(9) (1993).1 The Striker Replacement Law declares it an unfair labor practice for employers to hire permanent replacement employees during a *406strike or lockout. The plaintiff argued that the Striker Replacement Law was preempted by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The defendant, the United Steelworkers of America (USWA), and the inter-venor, the State of Minnesota,2 responded that, as between the parties…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harman v. ForsseniusSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Employers Association, Inc., for Itself and on Behalf of Its Member Employers v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc, State of Minnesota, Intervenor. Employers Association, Inc., for Itself and on Behalf of Its Member Employers v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc, State of Minnesota, Intervenor/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Shallowhorn v. CarrilloDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024